Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 8341 - 8360
of 18,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
Justice Mosk dissents, and would decide the case the other way.You gotta take this issue up, and definitely resolve it one way or the other. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:33 pm
In the recent case (Ali v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jane Schachter concludes that the case “will present an occasion for the Court—and especially Justice Kennedy—to reflect on” its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
It can be exhausting feeling like you’re speaking for your entire race. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
* When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continuedWarner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat) is the latest in a series of decisions in the ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
Nor is there any argument that the current Court might not follow Truax; Justice Kennedy cited it with approval three years ago in the substantively similar decision in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
Maybe the state doesn't need to regulate what's in a local department's disciplinary files so long as they're open. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:54 am
Thanks to Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
Barnai, 54, sustained a re-injury to his back. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
’ (People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
In late October, the Brazilian Ministry of Justice (the “Ministry”) issued its revised Draft Bill for the Protection of Personal Data. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 5:33 am
Reeves and Isabel V. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:36 am
The case of Luis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
Yesterday Jeremy reported on the latest addition to the (abundant) case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on Article 5(2) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm
Or so said Justice Scalia, answering a nutty hypothetical question he asked himself whilst concurring in Mullenix v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
So settle in, buckle up, hunker down, or do whatever it is that you do when you’re about to experience a serious glut of delicious Supreme Court flummery. [read post]
