Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8341 - 8360 of 21,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 9:15 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  This means that if plaintiff was in any way liable, even one percent liable, for the injuries he or she sustained, then that would be a bar from winning in court. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
In order to establish negligence in Florida, the plaintiff must show the following:  i) the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty to use reasonable care; ii) the defendant breached the duty to use reasonable care; iii) the defendants breach was a direct and proximate cause of the crane accident; and iv) the plaintiff suffered harm as a result. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Establishing negligence requires proof of the following elements: The defendant had a legal duty to exercise reasonable care; The defendant breached the legal duty to exercise reasonable care; The defendants breach was the actual and direct cause of the plaintiff’s injuries; and The plaintiff sustained damages. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:04 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
In Florida, negligence is established by showing the following elements:  the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care; the defendant breached that duty of care; and the plaintiff’s injuries and losses were a direct result of the defendants breach. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 6:58 am by Cathy Moran
All desireable outcomes, if it’s possible. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 6:57 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
As a result, the defendants could still be liable for failing to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe manner. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:42 am by Eric Beasley
In negligence cases, defendants can only be held liable for damages that result from actions that they have directly caused. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Jon Hyman
I would not aid or abet that strategy, but would have to defend it if you overrode my advise and blew the whistle to ICE. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Jon Hyman
I would not aid or abet that strategy, but would have to defend it if you overrode my advise and blew the whistle to ICE. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:08 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
The lower court had held that the defendants were immune from liability, according to the firefighter’s rule, and on appeal, the court analyzed whether the defendants had waived their claim to immunity. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
” The answer is “no,” and thus Defendants Motion to Dismiss must still be granted. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
But his contract with the purchaser provides that he will be in default -- and liable for damages and costs -- if he does not sign the deed in escrow.Can the Hearing Panel actually block the sale? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm by Andrew Frisch
Raimondo’s sole legal defense is that because he was never Arias’s actual employer, he cannot be held liable under the FLSA for retaliation against someone who was never his employee. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:18 am by Bob Bauer
 Lawyers defending public officials usually advise them to let the lawyers do the talking. [read post]