Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 8341 - 8360
of 120,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
Jacobsen v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
Century Indemnity Company v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:41 am
A person may use the car to “sleep it off,” even with the motor on and not be driving, and therefore not be guilty in the criminal case. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:41 am
A person may use the car to “sleep it off,” even with the motor on and not be driving, and therefore not be guilty in the criminal case. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
It appears to remain good law, albeit rather rarely used. [read post]
24 May 2018, 3:32 pm
Some of us have other work we gotta get done today as well. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this device is… [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:27 am
By Eric Goldman Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Moreover, we do not want to make gratuitous statements that may seem to address other of the multitude of land-use regulations, e.g. historic landmarking, etc. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
(People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:23 am
Court of Appeals dealt with a twist on the bolstering issue in Andre Mason v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals yesterday for reversing a conviction for attempted jail escape, due to the trial judge's refusal of the defendant's requested jury instruction that specific intent to escape is an essential element of the crime of attempted escape from jail. blank">Brawner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Uveges v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Kurz v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:21 am
Indeed, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Trade mark dilution has not been found in the U.S. when a famous mark is used for parody (Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog, LLC., 464 F. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
TR claimed its dossiers didn’t “use” the plaintiffs’ identity, citing Perfect 10 v. [read post]
