Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 70,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2014, 2:32 pm
This is not a trade mark infringement case, as Ms Matthews does not appear to be using the name in the course of trade. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 3:19 am
Finding the applied-for mark to be merely suggestive of applicant's services, the Board reversed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal and remanded the case for further proceedings.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: FWIW, at the TTAB, the case was heard by an augmented panel of five judges, including the Chief Judge and Deputy Chief Judge. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 3:27 am
" The CAFC remanded the case to the Board for consideration of "whether to declare that Great Concepts’ mark does not enjoy incontestable status and to evaluate whether to impose other sanctions on Great Concepts or its attorney. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 am
The hearings for the last two listed cases will be held at Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: For a case in which the plaintiff failed to establish standing because of a lack of reasonable damage, see the "goats on a roof" case, Robert Doyle v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:07 am
As to the prior registrations, Rule 2.41(b) provides that, "[i]n appropriate cases, ownership of one or more prior registrations on the Principal Register ... of the same mark may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness." [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:11 am
Each case must be decided on its own record. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:11 am
" Considering all the evidence, and bearing in mind the presumed validity of Respondent’s registered mark, the limited record in this case that “education lawyers” has been used descriptively does not support the conclusion that the mark is highly descriptive. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:45 am
In the early years of EU-harmonised trade mark law, trade mark protection seemed to provide a useful supplement to design registration. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
I don't think we've seen a Section 2(c) decision since the OBAMA BAHAMA PAJAMAS case in 2010, but we've got one here. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:28 am
US, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade.The issue in this case is whether wearing apparel from China bearing the brand-name "C'est Toi Jeans Los Angeles," "CT Jeans USA," and "C'est Toi Jeans USA" were properly the subject of a Notice to Mark or Redeliver for failure to have adequate country of origin marking. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:00 pm
Plaintiff alleged that the accident happened in an area marked “safe. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 5:48 pm
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram has this article marking a notable date in the history of Texas justice. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 10:08 am
In which case, BRILLIANT Mark! [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Continue reading The post Injured Driver Wins Favorable Jury Verdict and Still Appeals in Ouachita Parish Car Accident Case appeared first on Insurance Dispute Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:23 pm
Under Norwegian law, only those of Sámi descent who have a family history of reindeer herding as a primary occupation may mark and herd reindeer. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 12:43 pm
Typically, police officers will give the confidential informant marked bills and wait in a car and watch as the confidential informant approaches the defendant’s home and engages in a transaction. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysisGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy summarizes the Rapid Response event organized by AIPPI on the case Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Company Limited v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited, [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat), from the perspective of patent and competition law.Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusionGuest Kat Rosie Burbidge recaps the case SoulCycle Inc v Matalan Ltd, [2017]… [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:17 am
A mathematical discovery and a trade mark at once? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
