Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8341 - 8360
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 6:35 am
My sense though is that the sign is related to Target’s past use of the mark in the liquor store industry. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
That revocation comes with ancillary consequences – “that the presuit notice is deemed retroactively void” and “a plaintiff’s medical negligence claim may be barred by the statute of limitations” – doesn’t matter. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 pm
And it wasn’t just O2. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:12 pm
* New EPO Guidelines: what do they mean for added subject matter? [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
It didn’t allege specific affirmative representations of FDA approval. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Use of the whole mark doesn’t matter; strength of the mark favors defendant; etc. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:49 am
It won't matter that much in Texas, where the most important races aren't close. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
That plaintiffs didn’t call their claims “fraud on the FDA” didn’t matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:14 pm
I don’t see it that way. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We discern no principled basis upon which to justify awarding that additional amount.765 A.2d at 790 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:35 am
I wouldn’t suggest replacing HOW MATTERS with THE BIG MOO. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
Also, the court can conduct a hearing to “establish the truth of any allegation by evidence” and “investigate any other matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:29 am
Our London team, led by Dan Cooper, was recognized for its particular expertise in cross-border regulatory matters and international security breaches. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
They involve the narrow set of circumstances when the publication of truthful information can be punished.Over at his blog, Defending People, Mark Bennett responds to Citron's article, arguing that she is wrong to dismiss the First Amendment challenges. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:22 am
It didn’t really matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 4:07 am
The matter shown in broken lines is not part of the mark. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:08 pm
They might want to try again, though self-correction -- or any other kind for that matter -- doesn't wear well with the pious (when not snarky) Mark Oslers of the world. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
Simply calling the drivers independent contractors didn’t make it so. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:56 pm
And why wouldn’t it? [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Making matters worse, different federal courts have reached different conclusions when applying the “significant nexus” test. [read post]
