Search for: "Ruth"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 9,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am
” And then, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg repeatedly noted, the issue whether there actually may have been reasonable suspicion about narcotics on the facts of this case, a point not addressed by the court of appeals, would be open on remand. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm
When Verrilli began by saying it did not make much difference which way the Court proceeded, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shot back that, if the Court started with the proposition that the Constitution committed the power at issue solely to the President, that was the end of the case. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
(Jack) Kibbie 712.852.4140Paul McKinley 641.774.5784Amanda Ragan 641.424.0874Tom Rielly 641.673.5878Roby Smith 563.386.0179Steven Sodders 641.483.2383Kent Sorenson 515.962.2192Jack Whitver 515.865.6394Mary Jo Wilhelm 563.547.4156 Senators Voting "No" on Dove Hunting: Daryl Beall 515.573.7889 Joe Bolkcom 319.337.6280 Swati Dandekar 319.377.2087 Jeff Danielson 319.231.7192 William Dotzler 319.296.2947 Robert… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Seeming agreement that the Sixth Amendment does not apply – but perhaps its “test” does At yesterday’s oral argument, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, followed by Justice Elena Kagan, quickly established that Betterman is not demanding that the criminal case against him (to which he pled guilty) should be dismissed. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:28 am
The graph below covers all of the justices’ dissents so far this term aside from dissents in the court’s merits decisions (The only dissent from a merits decision so far, in which Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan joined, was written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor in Stokeling v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
On the one hand, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg characterized Ellis as “suggesting … that we should recognize this equitable estoppel, even though our treaty partners would not, which could yield divergent results and give you a real problem at the enforcement end because a country that doesn’t recognize equitable estoppel will hesitate to enforce an award that was based on that theory. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had a similar political split based on the party of the president who appointed them with Chief Justice John Roberts (Bush) and Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy (Reagan), Clarence Thomas (Bush I) and Samuel Alito (Bush II) on one side with Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton), Stephen Breyer (Clinton), Sonia Sotomayor (Obama), and Elena Kagan (Obama) on the other. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Louis Keith Robinson wkeithrobinson SMU Cassandra Burke Robinson AndraRobertson Case Western Jennifer Murphy Romig JenniferMRomig Emory Tom Russell houseofrussell Denver Meghan Ryan MeghanJRyan SMU Matthew Sag matthewsag Loyola Chicago Steve Sanders SteveSSanders Michigan Susan Scafidi CounterfeitChic Fordham Jason Schultz LawGeek Berkeley Michael Scott PrivacyLaw Southwestern Christopher Seaman cbseaman Washington & Lee Paul Secunda psecundaWrkProf Marquette Eric… [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shares Stevens’ attention to detail and nuance but tends to be more constrained about the exercise of judicial power. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, told Morazzini: “If you are supposing a category of violent materials dangerous to children, then how do you cut it off at video games? [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:28 am
For example, after many of us expressed disgust at the treatment of a federal judge shouted down by Stanford law students, Professor Jennifer Ruth wrote a column in the Chronicle of Higher Education heralding their actions. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
19 Nov 2009, 12:16 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), ... 3. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
It was around this time two years ago that Breyer made huge headlines when he wrote a dissent, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, calling for a wholesale re-examination of the constitutionality of the death penalty: “[R]ather than try to patch up the death penalty’s legal wounds one at a time, I would ask for full briefing on a more basic question: whether the death penalty violates the Constitution. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G story helps explain why Justice Kennedy would be the sole conservative Justice to join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s clear and forceful repudiation (a repudiation that has since been supported by a flood of originalist scholarship, including this piece) of ISL in the seminal 2015 Arizona ruling, a ruling that itself was seemingly embraced by the whole Court four years later in Rucho v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:50 am
For instance, if one queried, “Why did Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissent in Obergefell? [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg drew laughter from the audience by admitting that she doesn’t read all the mailings that she receives about her investments. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
Kennedy never joined calls from members of the court (Justices Harry Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg) to reconsider the constitutionality of the death penalty as a punishment, but his jurisprudential glosses on the court’s proportionality doctrine arguably strengthen the case for judicial abolition. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
Before the end of the argument, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked Hopper whether the Corps could simply stop providing JDs, which are not compelled by the statute, and thereby leave regulated parties worse off. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
SCOTUS-watchers figure the so-called liberal bloc of Justices (Ruth Bader Ginnsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and John Paul Stevens) will vote to condemn Proposition 8 as unconstitutional on Equal Protection grounds. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
And:In a dissent joined by Justices David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Breyer opined, equally emphatically, that the ICJ's Avena decision was, indeed, binding domestic law. [read post]
