Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 8341 - 8360 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 1:50 pm
United States, 479 U.S. 305, 310 (1987). [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:45 am by Howard Wasserman
The United States has never had a period of three major political parties; the system simply does not allow for it. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:53 am by Guest Blogger
Under the Ker-Frisbie doctrine – and as approved more recently in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Those who lived in the United States in 1792 surely had views on such mat- ters. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:46 pm by Katie Porter
("The United States has a direct interest in the resolution of that question because United States Trustees—who are Department of Justice officials appointed by the Attorney General—supervise the administration of bankruptcy cases. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm by Richard Renner
United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Detainees’ rights – the next round starts – SCOTUSblog: The United States Supreme Court Blog discuses the case of Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al-Odah — a Kuwaiti national who has been a captive at Guantanamo Bay for nearly nine years – which is winding its way through the US justice system. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:05 pm by azatty
Immediately after the Bush v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:15 am by J.E. Alvarez
Governments as different as Cuba and the United States may want to encourage the quiet settlement of such disputes precisely to avoid the production of precedent-setting law. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]