Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
United States, 335 U.S. 345 (1950) (“One article or thing is accompanied by another when it supplements or explains it . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
Back on June 28, 2012, Stockton filed a petition seeking to adjust its debts under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Use of the drug took place in a military context: everyone in the decedent’s unit took an antimalarial drug before shipping to Afghanistan. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
The Ericsson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
On April 3, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued the first federal court decision on this issue in Noble v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
In state and Federal courts throughout the country, the defense and plaintiffs’ bars are debating the application of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
America’s Best Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:56 am
The post-trial, post-damages-ruling procedures in the first Apple v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:40 am
Late Monday, Samsung filed with a federal court in California, showing that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had issued a “Final Office Action” on Apple’s ‘381 patent (commonly known as the “bounce-back” patent), reaffirming that patent’s invalidation. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
And a final-final USPTO decision can then be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm
[Marietta Drapery & Window Coverings Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
By Michael Hansen On February 22, California State Assembly Member Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, introduced a bill, AB 1229, to restore the ability of California cities and counties to require affordable housing as part of market-rate housing developments. [read post]
