Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8341 - 8360 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It is noted, however, that the import of this decision is tempered by the legislative enactment of the MCARE Act which mandates that, in medical malpractice cases, only doctors can serve as experts against doctors. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Christina Sonsire
  In August, Pennsylvania’s Superior Court handed down a ruling in Pringle v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
We might learn more about the Court of Appeal's views on this from Pfizer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm by Richard E. Vollertsen
This is done by the insurer imposing financial disincentives and refusing to honor our physicians' prescriptions without getting the doctor's office to confirm the prescription. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:40 pm
The Court stated that a claimant may recover for lost profit if the loss is reasonably foreseeable and can be proven with reasonable certainty. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:56 am by Levin & Perconti
The Illinois Medical Malpractice Act of 2005, which capped non-economic damages such as pain and suffering to $500,000 doctors and $1 million for hospitals, came before the court in the case of Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]