Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 8341 - 8360 of 8,932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
  The City of Los Angeles claims that it first came to light in February of 2007 when Bank of America announced that the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) had granted its amnesty application in exchange for full cooperation into the DOJ Anitrust Division’s investigation of market manipulation for municipal derivatives. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
  Nothing binds the United States to the rest of the world, and we need not adhere to the same set of rules that we demand others apply. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:39 am
The right to consular notification by a foreign citizen detained by law enforcement is a part of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations at the express insistence of the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
  Another brief, supporting a new trial, came jointly from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Public Knowledge, United States Internet Industry Association, and Computer & Communications Industry Association. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:48 pm
United States of America) (Mexico v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
But this case is not about the United States' or Texas' rights to implement criminal laws. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:00 pm
The following applications for permission to file an amicus/amici curiae brief in support of defendants/appellants/cross-respondents Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al. are granted: (1) Employers Group et al., (2) Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, (3) Retail Industry Leaders Association, (4) California Employment Law Council, and (5) Civil Justice Association of California. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:34 am
Yesterday, at its business meeting, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ordered favorably reported the following treaties:Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V) to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed To Be Excessively Injurious or To Have Indiscriminate Effects (Treaty Doc. 109-10);Amendment to Article 1 of the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
O'Donnell has responded that he would be willing to plead to a misdemeanor and pay a large fine, however, representatives of the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of California have stated that they would require O'Donnell to plead guilty to a felony. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]