Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 31,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 3:12 am
It also contains several case notes, inter alia, a commentary by Horatia Muir Watt on Vedanta v Lungowe, major decision on the parent company’s duty of care and private international law, rendered by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 10 April 2019 (see also here). [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Increasing Legal expenses: Corporate legal expenses are ballooning and this is too well known. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Adults were criminally convicted and placed in criminal detention, while the children were sent to Office of Refugee Resettlement facilities and foster care. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:58 am
Briefly: At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle report that “[u]nlike some of his contemporaries at the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens had a well-formed plan in place for public access to his papers,” meaning “that a significant segment of his papers will be made available to researchers relatively soon, in October 2020—again, unlike some of his colleagues. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:35 pm
"] I've seen several such attempts to get records of litigation sealed, because the plaintiff concludes that prospective future employers might decline to hire them as a result of such past lawsuits; yesterday's Gilliard v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
See Cascade Health Solutions v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
These policy considerations are well-founded. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm
Scalia also represented Bush in Bush v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
But the savvy attorney general must have been aware of an immediate tactical advantage as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:41 am
Gil v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
[The Structure of NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Part I, we will address the recent per curiam opinion in Frank v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
I think the ruling is so well-constructed and well-cited that it will be easy for the Ninth Circuit to affirm it, just as they did with the Sikhs for Justice ruling. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
Why doesn't Rule 106 cover oral statements as well? [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:37 pm
Blood Draw In Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 6:59 pm
Fragante v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:33 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
