Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 8361 - 8380 of 11,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 6:31 am by Eugene Volokh
And especially when the government has, rightly or wrongly, made some information a matter of public record, the dissemination of that speech is then generally protected; see Florida Star v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
Service out pursuant to a contractual agreement In NW Corp Pte Ltd v HK Petroleum Enterprises Cooperation Ltd,[17] the contract between the claimant and defendant, who were Singapore and Hong Kong-incorporated companies respectively, contained this clause: ‘This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the English law [sic]. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
 The Supreme Court rejected this vision in Deshaney v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
(IP Dragon) Recession + e-commerce = counterfeiting – discussion of Brandweek article ‘The Fight Against Fakes’ (IP Dragon) iPhones soon to find their way in China (IP Osgoode)   Europe Competition concerns lead to EU’s Google Book Search hearing (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) Intel tells EU court antitrust fine violated its human rights (Ars Technica) EPO and the IEEE agree on cooperation (BLOG@IP::JUR)   France Entangled in… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
B) Transparency and participation1) Public comments v. public consultations2) Optional v. mandatory methods III) Transparency and adjudication / Transparence et jugement A) Transparency and trial 1) Exception: in camera trial in common law v. in camera trial in civil law2) Extension of scope of transparency requirement: Transparency of alternative dispute resolution (arbitration, mediation and negotiation) B) Transparency and court ruling1) The obligation to give reasons… [read post]