Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 8361 - 8380 of 27,628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:47 pm by William W. Abbott
This paragraph does not apply where an action is brought based upon the complete absence of a general plan or a mandatory element thereof but does apply to an action attacking a general plan or mandatory element thereof on the basis that it is inadequate. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:34 pm by Larry S. Perlman
Now, the not-so-good news: The EEOC also noted that this decision not to renew does not affect the September 30, 2019, deadline by which private employers with 100 or more employees are required to submit Component 2 data for the calendar years 2017 and 2018. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:47 am by Barsumian Law
The MMA provides that healthcare providers are not liable for an amount in excess of $250,000.00 for an act of malpractice that occurs after June 30, 1999 and before July 1, 2017, $400,000.00 for an act of malpractice that occurs after June 30, 2017 and before July 1, 2019, and $500,000.00 for an act of malpractice that occurs after June 30, 2019. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"PERB decided that Aide's termination violated §209-a.1(a) of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] regardless of whether her work schedule was a mandatory or non-mandatory subject of negotiations, explaining that the City's action violated Aide's right to have union representation within the meaning of §202 of the Taylor Law.It seems clear that an employer does not have a legal duty to negotiate with a union if a subject matter proposed for… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"PERB decided that Aide's termination violated §209-a.1(a) of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] regardless of whether her work schedule was a mandatory or non-mandatory subject of negotiations, explaining that the City's action violated Aide's right to have union representation within the meaning of §202 of the Taylor Law.It seems clear that an employer does not have a legal duty to negotiate with a union if a subject matter proposed for… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm by Kelsey M. Mackin
” At the end of the warning letter, the FDA warned that if the firm does not respond, or if the FDA finds their response inadequate, further action may be taken; “For instance, we may take further action to refuse admission of your imported fish or fishery products. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 10:39 am by Giles Peaker
Shelter does not accept unsolicited CVs from external recruitment agencies nor accept the fees associated with them. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:57 am by Gregory Forman
However, a quirk in the rules regarding discovery is that a Defendant does not have to serve responses to such discovery requests until 45 days after service of the summons and complaint. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
It’s nice living in a country that does not let its contgous dieases run wild. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:35 pm
Within Marxist-Leninist political organizations, it does represent a significant opening meant to permit popular engagement without appearing to signal an (inevitable) movement toward liberal democratic organization.[14] And, of course, that move toward po [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:11 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
“Established before 9/11, this processing timeline does not reflect the operational realities USCIS currently faces when adjudicating employment authorization applications,” said USCIS Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:33 pm by Vishnu Kannan
And certainly in Dayton, Ohio, where in 30 seconds, one man guns down innocent people. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
According to XYPN, the interpretive release, thus, runs afoul of a 2-1 decision by the D.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The EEOC’s decision not to continue requiring the pay and hours-worked data does not affect the September 30 deadline. [read post]