Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 9,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 11:08 am
Broken into its component parts, the paragraph does four things: 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:47 am
Author House $19.95, hard cover, 195 pages, 978-1-4389-7529-0 (2009) I always enjoy reviewing books written by Maine writers - even more so when the writer is also a lawyer. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:01 am
But as the roadblock took shape on I-75 shortly after midnight on Oct. 1, 2007, traffic did not simply slow down. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
Chapter 1 describes the causes of the financial crisis and assesses is likely severity. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29a(1) and (2). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 9:13 pm
Rafael Leal-Arcas (Queen Mary Univ. of London - Law) has posted The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 133-235, 2009). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966); Kinetic Concepts, 554 F.3d at 1019. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
A qualified beneficiary who does not provide this notice is liable for 110 percent of the improperly paid subsidy amount. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
In 1996, approximately 73% of foodborne illness complaints in Massachusetts involved restaurants, while 1% were associated with caterers. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
All in all, I conducted 35 searches. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm
Energy Conservation 1. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
Means-plus-function clauses are permitted in claims by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
 Specifically, in the RID, ALJ Essex determined (1) that the accused refrigerators and components thereof do not infringe the asserted claims of the ‘130 patent literally or under the doctrine of equivalents; (2) that claims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9 of the ‘130 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Patent No. 6,509,751 in violation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
In objecting to the granting of a 40 percent density bonus, plaintiffs presented two main arguments: 1) section 65915 does not permit a 40 percent density bonus, and 2) the calculations of the density bonus were incorrect. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:44 pm
Injured In An I-35 Accident? [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
Last week, we shared with you a very interesting internal document from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett: a collection of notes or informal minutes from a June 2009 partners' meeting. [read post]
For federal income tax purposes, parties who enter into a divorce from bed and board are "unmarried"
14 Dec 2009, 12:51 pm
Thus, under federal law, 1 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
On January 1, 2006, China implemented its New Company Law. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
An infringer does not escape liability merely by infringing in secret. [read post]
