Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
MGN LIMITED v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Chabourn's most monumental accomplishment was the revision of almost all of the volumes of John Henry Wigmore's classic and mammoth multi-volume treatise on the American law of evidence, a treatise that is widely regarded as the greatest English-language legal treatise ever written. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:32 am
Undoubtedly (if the case makes it to trial) Google will rely heavily on the recent English judgment in Metropolitan International Schools v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
On Thursday, in Sykes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
However, in Shell Egypt West Manala et al v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm
They also made the argument that the Respondent did not operate within the jurisdiction of the English court. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:52 pm
In case you haven’t already heard… Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the Microsoft v. i4i case which has been one of the most closely watched cases on the Supreme Court’s docket during this term. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the countries within the jurisdiction of which the crime or offense was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
By Eric Goldman Habush v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
Much of that stems from the Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Boykin v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
In WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
In McNeill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
European practice follows the approach of the Irish farmer asked by an English visitor lost in the back roads of Kerry: "Can you direct me to Dublin? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
Naturally, the judge’s explicit ban of publication of information on Twitter and Facebook attracted a lot of attention on those platforms; and technology bloggers, as well as the mainstream press, were quick to report this apparent legal first for the English courts. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
Now there are two further English possession cases at the 'questions to the parties' stage of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
