Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 21,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
Last month, Lindsey provided readers of the Drug and Device Law blog with an overview of United Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:37 am
Texas declares, without explaining, that the deterrence value of keeping the state from keeping forfeited goods is “marginal at best. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
A window to this question can be found in the recent ruling of the United States Patent and Trademark Office decision in connection with oppositions filed by Royal Crown Company and Dr Pepper/Seven Up Inc.Royal Crown Company (RCC), opposed The Coca-Cola Company’s (TCCC) application for registrations of 17 marks, all of which contain the word ‘ZERO’, for goods in class 32, namely soft drinks, sports drinks, and, energy drinks. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:26 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:25 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm
Instead the Court in a well-reasoned opinion, focused on materiality, and in doing so rejected the Seventh Circuit’s holding in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm
Instead the Court in a well-reasoned opinion, focused on materiality, and in doing so rejected the Seventh Circuit’s holding in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm
Instead the Court in a well-reasoned opinion, focused on materiality, and in doing so rejected the Seventh Circuit’s holding in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
United States, No. 14-916, deals with the question of mootness and the "capable of repetition, yet evading review" concept. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” [14][1] United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
The criminal case is titled: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act – Good Faith Negotiations) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlWhite v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
(Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council (13 June 2013), p. 11)In the United States of America, although federal civil rights legislation has had undeniable positive impact, many African Americans in particular struggle to achieve their rights to full equality. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
These investigations have to do with what the companies knew about the conditions at their plants and what they did (or chose not do) about it.Furthermore, under the Park Doctrine, any corporate officer who had "authority with respect to the conditions that formed the basis of the alleged violations" can be held liable, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Good Faith Negotiations)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html White v. [read post]
