Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 8361 - 8380 of 269,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
"But, after the Coast Guard searches and finds the cocaine, the Coast Guard again asks Ecuador whether the ship is from Ecuador, and Ecuador then says it can "neither confirm nor deny" that it's from there.Which, according to the Ninth Circuit, means -- under federal law and permissible international law -- that the ship is stateless, and its occupants can be prosecuted by every nation in the universe.Doesn't it seem weird, though, that prior to searching,… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:02 am by Jay A. Fernandez
Justin is co-lead plaintiff in a first-of-its-kind class-action lawsuit, Justin v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:09 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Dassault Aviation SA v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 5 (Judgment 12 January 2024)] [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]