Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 18,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
On April 26, 2013, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upheld amendments to the PSESA and ruled that whether or not the Charter protects a right to strike is a matter that should be left to the Supreme Court of Canada to decide. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:58 pm
The man’s license had been revoked after a 2001 DUI accident involving the death of a young woman. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:20 pm
Does the lawyer ask questions that get to the heart of the matter? [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
Because, he reasons (p.85), the program “is actually affirmative actionrather than inaction. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
‘The ASA then referred to Revivo Tea v P Linzer / 13898 (29 June 2011), Loan Discovery SA v Brown / 21626 (17 April 2013) and the websites, http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/A/adwords.html and http://www.google.co.za/adwords/how-it-works/ , in coming to its decision that an Adword is not regarded as the “advertisement” itself, but merely as a trigger that ensures that a person’s advertisement is displayed. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
By Katerina P. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
” In Matter of Dale B., 96 N.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am
Specifically, it took aim at the court’s reliance on the “transformative use” test, saying, “That’s not one of the statutory factors, though the Supreme Court mentioned it in Campbell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
Three accounts were in trust for his daughter E, two for her children, V and P, one for his nephew J and one for his niece MY. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
David's (North Hollywood) et al.; Episcopal Church Cases, S155094 (Diocese of Los Angeles is plaintiff, joined by ECUSA; following its decision overruling the defendants' demurrers and reversing the trial court's grant of a motion to strike [45 Cal.4th 467, 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 275, 198 P.3d 66, cert. denied, 130 S.Ct. 179 (2009)], the California Supreme Court subsequently reversed a judgment entered against St. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:42 am
The Law Office of James P. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
The district court denied AQHA’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and entered an injunction “that specified the rule changes AQHA must adopt to permit breed registration of cloned horses. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The Court stated specifically, “[p]ost-verdict ex parte communications between the trial court and jurors cannot be countenanced. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Although the events in the present matter transpired prior to the decision in Gunn, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal civil law “must be given full retroactive effect in all cases still open on direct review and as to all events, regardless of whether such events predate or postdate [the Supreme Court’s] announcement of the rule. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
P. 54(b), allowing certain other plaintiffs to appeal, even though they had other claims remaining. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Tarango, 182 Ariz. 246, 251, 895 P.2d 1009, 1014 (Ariz. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Tarango, 182 Ariz. 246, 251, 895 P.2d 1009, 1014 (Ariz. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
In rejecting CBD’s contrary arguments, the Court held: “The [P]EIR does not impermissibly defer formulation of mitigation measures, as it provides sufficient performance standards for future mitigation to meet. [read post]
