Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8361 - 8380
of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 10:48 am
As for calling people out on it, she said exactly what Mark Bennett has been saying: If lawyers themselves don’t regulate the practice, who will? [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:19 am
The idea that this would be a grievable matter is another example of government-applied pressure on daily life. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:53 am
” Mead Johnson counterclaimed for breach of contract, defamation, violation of the Lanham Act, and civil contempt.On the contract claim, Mead Johnson failed to win summary judgment in its favor because it hadn’t established damages as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
If consumers think that Electrolux makes private label brands, isn't it possible that they'd think that the Perfects were private-label productions despite the differing word marks? [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:57 pm
And, indeed, to some extent, the opening quote and the angst of "Westlessness" on which the 2020 Munich Security Report is grounded, reminds us that Western elites are as stuck in the 191th century (the moment of its European apotheosis) as much as certain elements of Chinese and other elites are as stuck in the same century (marking the moment of their greatest decay). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
They received it and said the matter would be corrected. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Twitter isn’t liable for trademark infringement for a hacked account that it doesn’t suspend quickly enough. * Evoqua Water Technologies LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
Given that a Tor user has not voluntarily shared his IP address, it doesn’t matter that obtaining an IP address from a third party or a visited website would not be a search in other circumstances that did involve voluntarily sharing. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
That’s the sum total of the discussion of preemption in Carter – the defendant was right, and the plaintiff wrong, about the process that was at issue, but without unspecified “clear authority,” the opinion simply refuses to recognize preemption, no matter how close the analogy, and without explaining why.Even though the defendant did not prevail on preemption in Carter – very unconvincingly – the opinion was interesting because it turned us onto a… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:10 am
Jan. 11, 2016) (en banc) H/T Eric Goldman. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
We don’t maintain paper files. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Our view stands in marked contrast to the view expressed by defenders of originalism and textualism. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"Tom Cruise Doesn't Need Your Pity. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis, LLP, Dayton, for Appellants Roetzel & Andress LPA and Mark A. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:28 am
I explained that no matter who does the appraisal, no matter its regional, local, or national nature, and no matter how it is done, the output is an estimated. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:42 pm
Taghi T., 28, of Boston, (hereinafter, "Defendant 1") was awaiting his mail on Wednesday. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:10 am
 That doesn't mean there couldn't have been other ways to play cricket, or that the world would be better off if we interpreted the rules of cricket differently, but to win the argument we have to fashion it in a way that appears to be consistent with cricket. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
If we’re not discussing why Mark Zuckerberg won’t sue The Social Network, then we’re talking about you unilaterally changing your Terms of Use or your potential patent battle with Google over Foursquare. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
Since the summary is approximately 480 pages, 15 percent could mean upwards of 70 pages of redactions.Senator Mark Udall is reported to have said that he will work with Sen. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
” In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman also discussed the significance of the Court’s opinion, arguing that “[t]he decision matters because it signals that the court is moving away from interpreting the law to give government exclusive control over enforcement — and that may possibly hold a clue for the future of securities regulation. [read post]
