Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 8361 - 8380 of 16,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Use according to Claim 1 wherein the pain is neuropathic painActavis had applied for a marketing authorisation, now granted, under the abridged procedure with a skinny label limited to the treatment of epilepsy and general anxiety disorders. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bertwistle v Conquest ([2015] QDC 133) the Court entered default judgment, granting an injunction and awarded damages of Aus$100,000 in respect of defamatory text messages alleging sex abuse. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am by Ben
Azerbaijan’s Copyright Agency has issued a statement saying Armenians have been stealing the Azerbaijani peoples’ musical compositions, folklore samples and other intangible values for years. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm by Cody Poplin
It’s a question that for most people exists more in theory than in practice. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:40 am
 If you're making that much, should IFP status be granted? [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:02 pm
The bill fails to distinguish any situation when targeted surveillance might be justified or not, thus granting unchecked and excessive powers to intrude into the private lives of all Paraguayans. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Jon Sands
This instruction was required under the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
When asked who was expressing concern, she testified that she had heard this from “people on the street” and “people leaving a voice mail. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
Vilas County v Accola, 2015 WL 2193002 (WI App. 5/12/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Zoning - Interpretation [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:44 pm by Charla Bizios Stevens
Photo: dbking via Flickr (CC by 2.0) The US Supreme Court on June 1, 2015 decided the highly publicized case of EEOC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
I blogged about the opinion back when the Court granted certiorari in Elonis to answer this question presented:Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
In the closing days of the recently concluded May term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in Marks v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Because an employee presented no evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that DHL’s Birmingham facility constituted a single site of employment, the appeals court affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of DHL (Likes v. [read post]