Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 41,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am
EPA, which ruled that Clean Air Act regulations had to target individual power plants rather than giving states flexibility regarding how to meet broader standards. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:19 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:34 pm
Curcini v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am
The Court also heard argument in Williamson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
In some other states, in some kinds of cases, courts are allow to enforce contracts to the extent that they are reasonable. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
’ Id. quoting State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:42 am
See Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
” The argument that there was an abuse of power was rejected on the grounds that Mr Hartnett had not targeted the Claimants. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 8:41 am
Case Citation: Kohls v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 8:09 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:23 pm
Under Marbury v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
In the Court’s opinion the use of AFR is less invasive in this sense, so that common law powers could be relied on . [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:25 am
As is well established, judgments delivered in exercise of powers under Article 142 are not precedent and are generally not relied upon as having laid down principles as has been confirmed recently in State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:27 am
OK, some antitrust enforcement accelerated its adoption--but that's precisely what is needed against Apple's single-browser-engine policy now.The 2020 United States et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
While this is undoubtedly true, it did lead me to consider a broader concern: When does the power of persuasion become the power of coercion? [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
While this is undoubtedly true, it did lead me to consider a broader concern: When does the power of persuasion become the power of coercion? [read post]
