Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2013, 10:19 pm
Artistic and legal minds want to know "Does the California Resale Right Act (the "Act") violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
It's now official that a new Apple v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm
Snow has melted, but campers still braving the cold for second day of arguments at Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Court heard arguments in the federal Defense of Marriage Act, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 6:38 am
Yet, states like California started governing its use as far back as 1996. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
This didn’t please the FDA, which sent a warning letter to AMARC, stating that since Poly-MVA isn’t FDA-approved, the customer testimonials essentially falsify the product as approved.Here's the letter:HomeInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal InvestigationsEnforcement ActionsWarning LettersEnforcement ActionsWarning Letters2012-Amarc Enterprises 12/11/12Department of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health ServiceFood and Drug AdministrationLos Angeles… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:10 pm
The written transcript and audio recording of Wednesday's arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:32 pm
But will he have the courage to decide that California cannot bar gay marriage, or that the U.S. cannot refuse to recognize marriages performed in states where it is legal? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Pender of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) made an initial determination on remand ("remand ID") in the investigation of Apple's complaint against Samsung. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
The audio recording and unofficial version of the transcript of the oral arguments in the Defense of Marriage Act case (United States v. [read post]
