Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8361 - 8380
of 15,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
The court states that the majority position is mistaken that section 506 is the only source of authority for a deficiency and that per Butner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:27 pm
" [b.] [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
There is no proven health difference between mechanically homogenized cow's milk and naturally homogenized goat's milk.Myth #4. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Both awards were affirmed on appeal in Barrett v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 8:00 am
I’ve covered the risks of narrowing Section 230(c)(2)(B) extensively in the context of the Enigma v. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 12:27 pm
Code § 3426.7(b). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
Holden v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:45 am
See State v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Sexual Assault has been much in the news in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
This decision was keenly-awaited since it was the first interpretation of the CJEU's ruling in January 2014 in Case C-355-12 Nintendo v PC Box [on which see Katpost here and links to earlier comments; one R Black appeared for Nintendo in this reference ...] on the effectiveness of TPMs and enforceability of rights against those who seek to circumvent them. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:28 am
EdgemarCenter fortheArts d/b/a Larry moss studios c/o Lora Guarnieri, FA1004001320711 (Nat. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:15 pm
Eligible contract participant The term “eligible contract participant” means— (A) acting for its own account— (i) a financial institution; (ii) an insurance company that is regulated by a State, or that is regulated by a foreign government and is subject to comparable regulation as determined by the Commission, including a regulated subsidiary or affiliate of such an insurance company; (iii) an investment company subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act… [read post]
