Search for: "State v. Law" Results 8361 - 8380 of 173,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
However, such a result is possible: in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice ECJ C-393/10 (01 March 2012), the Supreme Court held that a judge was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of EU law (specifically the Part-Time Workers Framework Directive 97/81/EC). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:30 am by Nathaniel Grow
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's seminal opinion in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Section 230 was enacted as a response to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 10:04 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Menkes, Monetary Transfer Provisions and the Rule of Law from the International Investment Law Perspective 36 Boris Praštalo, On Corruption in International Arbitration Exploring the Topic through the Lens of the mol v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 11:17 am by Victoria VanBuren
Strong (University of Missouri School of Law) has posted  “Mass Procedures as a Form of ‘Regulatory Arbitration’ – Abaclat v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:48 am by Mavrick Law Firm
However, under Florida law, a choice of law provision does not automatically confer personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state litigant to be sued in the same state as the chosen law. [read post]