Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
[quoting Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
The parties’ remaining contentions are academic in light of the foregoing. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
See Young v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am
Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 4:34 am
In light of the plaintiffs’ failure to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, we need not consider whether they had a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Trokaik Realty, Inc. v HP Yuco, HDFC, Inc., 188 AD3d at 1282). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Skidmore v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
Paternoster in an unattractive light due to the nature of the personal files.... [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:23 pm
This sentiment is mirrored outside the legal academy with intense media focus on nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States and increasing attention to the issue of judicial recusal in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am
After this Court vacated that decision and remanded for further consideration in light of Ziglar v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
In Matters of Rey v Spinetta, Even if the Family Court had jurisdiction under Domestic Relations Law § 76-a (1) (a), "pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-f, a court of this state which has jurisdiction may decline to exercise it if it finds that New York is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum". [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Adirondack Enters. v Hartford Cas. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
Less than a month ago, in Koons v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
” Clayworth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 12:56 pm
In Varjabedian v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 11:14 am
” Because the statements were protected opinion, the false light, Lanham Act, and state law competition claims also fail, the judge ruled. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
SA's conduct, viewed in such a different light, might not have appeared criminal. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Further, 4 NYCRR 5.3(b), which applies to officers and employees of the State as the employer, in pertinent part provides that "... [read post]
