Search for: "State v. Register" Results 8361 - 8380 of 13,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 3:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
  You can register for the webinar on the State Bar Labor and Employment Law Section's web site, here. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ernest E. Badway
Hood, III (December 12, 2012), http://judicialview.com/State-Cases/texas/Employment/Institutional-Securities-Corporation-v-Hood/22/568743. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
In a recent Colorado case - People v Lorenzo Brooks - the defendant's conviction's conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was overturned because his out of state Texas conviction had no Colorado sex crime equivalent. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
His business partner, Matthew Taylor, cared for two registered qualifying patients. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 12:15 pm
  You've got to register the place (and pay a fee), include with your registration a copy of the medical marijuana card for every patient, and potentially even have a notarized letter from the owner of the property. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am by Venkat
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
This provision states that: The following shall not be registered: … (c) trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or service. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]