Search for: "State v. South"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 10,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s)… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
So far, the following have also signed on as amicus – the State of Wisconsin, South Dakota, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Michigan, Kansas, Louisiana, Iowa, Indiana, Idaho and Missouri. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
: Everpure, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
China South China Morning Post has considered how facial recognition has developed ahead of legislation. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In Welcome to Everyman: A Journey into the English Mind the philosopher Julian Baggini decided to live in Rotherham in South Yorkshire for 6 months in 2005 ‘in an attempt to understand the English mind. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Thus, however obviously sensible it would be to join North Dakota and South Dakota together in "Dakota," that can't be done without the consent of each of the states (as well as Congress), and, of course, one cannot imagine circumstances where the Dakotas would decide that having two senators is better than the present four;2) the right, guaranteed in Article V, to each state to veto any change in the (indefensable) allocation of equal voting power… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:42 am
BrazilSilveira v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Fifield v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
That the right to free speech may trump trade mark rights was recognised by the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Laugh It Off Promotions v South African Breweries etc., 27th May 2005, Case CCT 42/04 [on which see IPKat here]. ...14. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
In summary The above decisions demonstrate the ease with which adverse action claims may be brought, the importance of having credible evidence to support the reason for dismissal, and the high potential costs for an employer who does take unlawful adverse action. [1] Employees of employers who are not in the federal workplace relations system, such as small unincorporated businesses or partnerships, cannot bring adverse action claims. [2] Section 341 Fair Work Act 2009. [3] Keenan v… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:22 pm
(See South Side Woodwork v RC Contracting, [1989] A.J. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 3:06 pm
The refiled October 21, 2024, Court of Appeals opinion in Abbas-Ghaleb v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:16 pm
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Mountain Cement Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 10:19 pm
She corresponded with Keira V. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
One example of this was the 2018 Florida Supreme Court case of Newton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm
State-imposed racial segregation was upheld in Plessy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
One example of this was the 2018 Florida Supreme Court case of Newton v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:53 am
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
