Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 8,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Two states, Michigan and (later) Texas, apply the exception to a presumption of non-defectiveness based upon FDA compliance. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:05 pm
Texas, on October 10. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Texas and Roper v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:13 am
But in November 2006, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied it, saying that ICJ decisions are not binding on U.S. courts, and that the executive memorandum demanding state compliance exceeded presidential authority. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964); Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:49 am
MercExchange LLC case, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 12:49 pm
Preston v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:05 am
An Israeli court asserted jurisdiction over Carlton, a foreign citizen, and stated that as long as a portion of the illegal activity (here, gambling) occurred in Israel, there is no need for universal jurisdiction, and the website operator is subjected to the Israeli law (State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:54 pm
If they are guilty of hiding the huge discounts to commercial customers in order to avoid paying rebates on the difference between AMP (Average Manufacturer's Price)and Best Price, which Federal and State Medicaid law requires they pay, this is a violation of the False Claims Act and is a Qui Tam case.The amended complaint was filed in Camera under seal in May, 2007 with Plaintiff's, U.S., several states including Florida and… [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
Beal Bank bought from U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
Beal Bank bought from U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 5:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
U.S. (07-6395, download here), filed Sept. 4 by the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Law School, raises five issues, but the Confrontation Clause question is the central one. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:17 pm
U.S. (07-6395, download here), filed Sept. 4 by the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Law School, raises five issues, but the Confrontation Clause question is the central one. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:46 am
The petition in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 30, 2007 US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 11:21 pm
Texas, held that the U.S. [read post]
