Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
The new prescribed forms under the amended Condo Act regulations are generally terrible. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unlawful. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
Florida Bar (2015). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm
The proposed regulations specify that the rules proposed would become effective for taxable years ending on or after the date of publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the Federal Register. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
It certainly wasn’t that domestic abusers were barred from possessing weapons in the 18th or 19th centuries. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
Even though the Federal Circuit couched its analysis in terms of "standing" and not on Lucas background principles, its decision that the postregulation transfer of property barred the takings claim was plainly grounded in the idea that the plaintiff did not possess "property" protected by the Fifth Amendment from uncompensated de facto acquisition. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
" "Accepting that position would largely vitiate the rule that 'only in relatively narrow and well-defined circumstances may government bar public dissemination of protected materials to [minors].'" The State regulation here, like the one in Brown, is not narrowly tailored to address the harms that the State contends are encountered by minors on social media. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Such damages were barred in New Jersey by the filed rate doctrine, which prohibits courts from entertaining challenges to regulated rates. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 12:22 pm
Since the court found that historically training with common weapons was never barred in areas where firearms practice was otherwise permitted and nor did it find historical evidence of prohibitions on the commercial operation of gun ranges, it concluded that the rules attract intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
I noted that the rule is being challenged on constitutional grounds and that lawyers will either have to distinguish the New York rule from the one that was upheld in Florida Bar v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge to a California law regulating pregnancy-crisis-center disclosures; Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
As a result, the Court upheld a statute that bars "material support" of terrorist organizations, ruling that the statute barred speech coordinated with DFTOs, including training in negotiation or the use of international law. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:08 am
A slow-moving revolution is taking place in First Amendment jurisprudence over the government's right to regulate certain forms of offensive commercial speech. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:32 am
It says it will amend those regulations “as soon as possible” to remove the requirement for a solicitor to hold those higher rights to exercise a right of audience in the IPEC. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:54 pm
The Regulation also provides a health plan that existed on March 23, 2010 will lose its eligibility for grandfathered status if the plan is amended to make significant changes that cut benefits or increase costs to covered persons. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
Lee Optical (1955), the leading Supreme Court precedent on licensing and other "economic" regulations, says that the the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which bars states from restricting "life, liberty, or property" without "due process of law"), is satisfied so long as the regulation in question passes a minimal "rational basis" test: it must be "rationally related" to a… [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:34 pm
Kavanaugh rejected the government’s contention that the courts can only bar agencies from enforcing the improper rule against a particular challenger. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
The foreclosure bar is referring to the bill as the "30-30-30 Law. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
The language of the proposed bill states: For purposes of any private civil action implied under this title, any person that knowingly or recklessly provides substantial assistance to another person in violation of this title, or of any rule or regulation issued under this title, shall be deemed to be in violation of this title to the same extent as the person to whom such assistance is provided [read post]
