Search for: "Arnold v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
  This is assuming that the mark’s distinctiveness is a live issue, and bearing in mind that the court’s consideration of this issue might depend on the particular s 3(1)/7(1) subsection it deems to be enlivened.In Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch) at [40]-[45],Arnold J outlined the general principles involved in assessing distinctiveness, stressing the broad nature of this inquiry. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:06 am
Recently, Justice Arnold in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch) held that 8 second cricket clips infringed copyright in broadcasts of matches, discussed here in a Kat post.Agon also stated that rival website Chessbomb had created an app that allowed spectators of live matches to leak the moves. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
California Dreaming Bodybuilder and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger had long been interested in politics, but as a moderate Republican (then still married to a prominent Democrat) in a state with a hard-right Republican base, he could not get nominated by the Republicans as dog-catcher. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Velazquez, etc., appellant, v Bruno Decaudin, et al., defendants, Arnold Streisfeld, etc., et al., respondents. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
In my judgment Mr Arnold fell into error in characterising the registration of marks in a series in the way that he did. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Arnold J granted the claimants in the case of Ali v Channel 5 permission to appeal on quantum. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:11 pm
California Lethal Injection Protocol Invalidated From the blog The Dream AntillesGreat news.A California Court of Appeal has invalidated California's lethal injection protocol because the state failed to comply with the state's Administrative Procedure Act.The decision(pdf format) in Morales v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
   Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
However, Eeva disagreed, stating that in her view the ETSI principle was to license end products and that was how IPR holders had always understood it. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
(ii) ‘Customers' Arnold J, when dismissing the action at first instance, stated “the key question is whether the viewers of PCCM’s programmes in the [UK] were customers for its service so as to give rise to a protectable goodwill in the UK”. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]