Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 821 - 840 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States On 3 October 2018 the Federal Emergency Management Agency conducted a nationwide test of the Wireless Emergency Alert system. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 11:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
STATEMENT REGARDING RULING STRIKING DOWN THE INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT We strongly disagree and are deeply disappointed with Judge O’Connor’s decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
  Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
In a video on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a case that held that Congress, by prohibiting a state from partially repealing a state law, impermissibly commandeered the powers of the state; (4) Janus v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the justices held that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” under the appointments clause, who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head; they predict “interesting times ahead for the Administrative State. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
The Court should have perhaps established a ‘litmus test’ setting out criteria to determine instances when one has been “prejudiced enough” something akin to the balancing test set out in the American case, Baker v Wingo[22]. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]