Search for: "Belt v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm
In Sirbaugh v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
The decision from two weeks ago—a Friday—in LaBarre v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
(and its subsequent case, Musnuff v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
But nonetheless, this belt-and-braces approach has made its way into the DPA 2018. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 12:11 pm
Nagla v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
Hutchinson noted here back in 1993, Article 102 is most often honored in the breach, and has little relevance today to determining the legal status of an agreement (the ICJ appears to have agreed with him based on its holdings in the jurisdictional phase of Qatar v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
We've kept our own fiscal house in order, preparing responsibly for the downturn with eight different belt tightenings over the last three years, while spending in Albany has continued to spiral out of control. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
That may have happened last week in the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
In Deutsche Bank AG v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:34 pm
Capitol v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:25 am
State of California (Caltrans) – $2 million Doe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
