Search for: "Belt v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The California state courts had agreed with Mazda’s arguments and threw out the families’ lawsuit. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. in the case of The Estate of Thanh Williamson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
v=0s98UWx8atw http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
In other words, the system we currently use has a both a belt and suspenders to keep it from falling down. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:34 am
Mazda (holding that a lawsuit claiming Mazda should've installed shoulder belts for a rear passenger seat was not forbidden by federal regulation that allowed manufacturers to use lap belts) with Geier v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 pm
The SCOTUS's decision in Williamson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:31 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm
So today, along comes Williamson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:45 pm
In Williamson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:53 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:23 am
Mazda Motors of America [docket], finding that a federal minimum safety standard [text] does not preempt state tort actions. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
