Search for: "Bird v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
by Catherine Jasserand On 9 February 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its judgment in the case Martin Luksan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
Rights to Animal Genetic Resources by Michelangelo Temmerman € 130 Guide to EU Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law 2011 by Sally Shorthose, Bird & Bird LLP € 222 • Leave a comment on European Commission: two new IP-roadmaps [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:14 pm
The Sea Bird Jazz Lounge is attached to the restaurant. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
That case is California Common Cause v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
Rights to Animal Genetic Resources by Michelangelo Temmerman € 130 Guide to EU Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law 2011 by Sally Shorthose, Bird & Bird LLP € 222 • Leave a comment on SABAM v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
by Maurizio Borghi High Court Chancery Division, 3 February 2012, Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Morey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
United States but in dissent.See, when you dig down into the Third, there's all kinds of resonance. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:36 pm
(Romer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
This event is being kindly hosted at the London office of Bird & Bird LLP [Merpel is most amused to discover that Bird & Bird tweets at @twobirdsIP]. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Having read Judge Reinhardt’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Kay v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
But by early January, when the instrument had still not been signed, and when rumours were circulating that the text was undergoing review following the decision of the CJEU in the case of Scarlett Extended v SABAM , the plaintiffs in the UPC case issued proceedings against the State citing failure to implement the Directive and seeking redress based on the Frankovich principle. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:18 am
ECOPRESS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:25 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Liddle, Eakin achieves a Coleridgean tone with his first line, “The emu’s a bird quite large and stately . . . . [read post]