Search for: "Black v. State of New York"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 10:35 am
That is why New York, for example, had no death penalty in practice for a very long time even though it was on the books. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
There are also three specific areas where I think I was able to shed some important new light on his life and thought. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
The New York State Human Rights Law and Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 also prohibit employment discrimination based on race. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm
The Washington Post A Black Man Spent 7 Years in Prison. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
In an op-ed at Fox News, Kelly Shackleford weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Because “New York Times v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On Monday 25 and Tuesday 26 February, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of UBS AG New York & Ors v Fairfield Sentry Ltd (In Liquidation) (British Virgin Islands). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:34 am
” The guidelines state that “Black hairstyles are…an inherent part of Black identity,” and are therefore protected by the NYCHRL. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
He disregards that the actual malice standard set in New York Times v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
Supreme Court ought to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
New York, a challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, with oral argument during the second week in April. [read post]