Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 821 - 840
of 9,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 1:56 pm
The text of the April 25, 2012, decision in FTC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Given the attention and dollars spent on this game, it is a wonder that the brand is not better protected! [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 2:31 pm
Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
See Chiquita Brands International v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
Fellowes, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Supreme Court: Accountants do not have legal privilege http://ow.ly/h7ICK Canada | CN Rail v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
As we mentioned previously, that issue is currently pending in the Alabama Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:11 am
Supreme Court dealt a big-blow to big tobacco companies in its Altria Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Connolly in F’Real Foods, LLC et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Supreme Court: Accountants do not have legal privilege http://ow.ly/h7ICK Canada | CN Rail v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:57 am
Intercontinental Great Brands LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court yesterday unanimously rejected in American Needle v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:02 am
The Ninth Circuit, siding with the Sixth Circuit in its decision in Beaudry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:16 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:28 am
James Barnard v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:45 am
Lokey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Consider Hanberry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm
To read more about the case above please read Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
The panel will take a critical look at recent cases which have acknowledged the advertising function, including L’Oreal v Bellure, Intel, Google France and L’Oreal v eBay, and will consider how much protection really is being afforded to the advertising function in Europe. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm
According to ACI, this is an "advanced forum for brand name and generic counsel on the intricacies of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]