Search for: "Burwell v. Burwell"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in the Hobby Lobby case continues to reverberate in legal and political circles, with seemingly every angle of the majority’s bizarre decision being scrutinized, defended, and ridiculed. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:02 am
Burwell, issued on April 9. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am
In Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Brown, The Girard Will and Twin Landmarks of Supreme Court History, 41 Journal of Supreme Court History 7-20 (2016).Carol Goforth, A Corporation Has No Soul, and Doesn't Go to Church: Relating the Doctrine of Piercing the Veil to Burwell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:08 am
Burwell. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Finally, it is unsettling to see Jack positively refer to Bush v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
DeGirolami, On Expressivism and Retributivism in 'The Mighty and the Almighty', (Journal of Analytic Theology (Forthcoming)).Caroline Mala Corbin, The Contraception Mandate Accommodated: Why the RFRA Claim in Zubik v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
My new article, Contrived Threats v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
In its brief to the Court in King v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:58 pm
Oklahoma has filed its own petition, asking the Court to grant review of the separate case of Oklahoma v Burwell and schedule it along with the King case for decision before the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:44 am
In Texas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am
Burwell, 135 S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
That became apparent when the Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
The case, Kisor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
In King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
Burwell. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
Legal Services Group v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm
[Update]⇾In Williams v. [read post]