Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 821 - 840 of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Even though by itself not decisive (“whether or not a method is excluded from patentability under A 53(c) cannot depend on the person carrying it out” G 1/07 [3.4.1] see also G 1/04 discussed therein), this criterion gives a further indication that the claimed method might fall under the exclusion clause. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
There is a referral pending before the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the EPO on the issue of double-patenting (G 1/19). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am by Nico Cordes
A board which has taken a specific decision in ex-parte appeal proceedings may be compelled to directly interfere with its own earlier decision if the same issues are relevant in opposition appeal proceedings (for example, if the same amendments were allowed under Article 123(2) EPC before grant and were attacked under Article 100(c) EPC in opposition). [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:40 pm
In C v Health Service Provider [2008] PrivCmrA 3 a health service provider disclosed details of a letter from a member's relative to the member.The matter was resolved by an apology to the relative by the provider. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by Andrew Perlman
  An applicant who meets the requirements of (a) through (g) of this Rule may, upon motion, be admitted to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 12:15 pm
The case law is not clear on whether a person must be able to understand the extent of his or her property to meet the legal tests for capacity.The Adult Guardianship and Planning Statutes Amendment Act, 2007, which was passed by the Legislative Assembly, but is not yet in force, will help clarify the tests for capacity to make a power of attorney in British Columbia.Section 12 provides as follows:12 (1) An adult may make an enduring power of attorney unless the adult is incapable of understanding… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:56 am by George Truitt
§ 718.104(4)(e), a surveyor’s certificate of substantial completion must be recorded before a condominium’s “[c]ompleted units . . . may be conveyed to purchasers. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:55 am by J
; (d) it is a “given”  that an authority does not have to plead and prove proportionality unless they want to ([53]); (e) it is an “exceptional” case where Art 8 would “even arguably” create a right to remain in possession where the applicant had no right to remain in domestic law (at [45], [53]) (f) implications for the private sector are left open (at [4], [50]) (g) demoted tenancies are compatible with Art 8 as the court is empowered to decide… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:17 am by Samantha Gronewald
  Premarital agreements may include provisions relating to: (a) property rights and obligations of the parties; (b) rights of disposing of, managing and controlling property; (c) disposition of property upon death or divorce; (d) the making of wills, trusts, or other arrangements to carry out the provisions of the agreement; (e) disposition of life insurance death benefits; (f) choice of law; and (g) any other matter not in violation of public… [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:27 pm
In denying a petition to factor structured settlement payments to Peachtree, the Pennsyvania Court of Common ruled April  7, 2009,  in the matter of "In Re:   Anne G. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:13 pm
Thermal facilities are those that combust biomass, as newly defined by O.Reg. 160/99: “biomass” means organic matter, other than source separated organics, that is derived from a plant or animal, is available on a natural renewable basis and is, (a) grown or harvested for the purpose of being used to generate electricity, (b) waste from harvesting or processing agricultural products or waste from processing forestry products, including spent pulping liquor, (c)… [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
While the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure has not required any more than citation to the official reports for civil appeals since January 1, 2015, for criminal matters Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.13(c)(vi) currently requires citation “also when possible to the unofficial reports. [read post]