Search for: "CHIEF MOORE"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
As the Federal Circuit continues to be divided, it is most interesting to consider the sides that have formed: Supporting Rehearing (and broader scope of CBM review, and broader 101 application): Chief Judge Prost and Judges Lourie, Dyk, Wallach, and Hughes Against Rehearing (for narrower CBM review and reduced 101 application): Judges Moore, Taranto, O’Malley, Reyna, Newman, and Chen. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:15 am
The differences between these cases might be the Judges: Judges Newman, Lourie, and Moore deciding Checkpoint Sys in favor of no-fees against the patentee; and Chief Judge Prost, and Judges Wallach and Mayer deciding Rothschild in favor of fees against the patentee. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
Court of Appeals Decision In a decision authored by Judge Schafer, with Judges Hensal and Moore concurring in the judgment only, the Ninth District reversed in part, finding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Rails-to-Trails on the Landowners’ adverse possession claims and on its counterclaims for declaratory judgment and to quiet title. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:15 am
Former Chief Judge Paul Michel noted that “Judge Newman may hold the record for the most dissents. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justice O’Donnell Key Statutes and Precedent Sperry v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:12 am
An opening exchange with Chief Judge Prost laid the groundwork that although the AIA sought efficient patent validity review outside the courts, it also constrained the administrative alternatives in a variety of ways. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:10 am
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:05 am
In Alabama this week, Roy Moore who has been suspended for the rest of his term as Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court because of his defiance of same-sex marriage rulings (see prior posting) announced that he will formally resign from his judicial position in order to run for the United States Senate. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:04 pm
" And The Associated Press reports that "Suspended Alabama Chief Justice Moore running for US Senate. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 6:54 pm
"Suspended Chief Justice Roy Moore to announce plans Wednesday": Mike Cason of AL.com has a report that begins, "Suspended Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore will announce his future plans on the steps of the State Capitol on Wednesday. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:51 am
" Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore's suspension has been upheld by the state's Court of the Judiciary. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
National: Social Media Is Not Contributing Significantly to Political Polarization, Paper SaysNew York Times – Jonah Engel Bromwich | Published: 4/13/2017 Many have argued that social media, where users can find their viewpoints reinforced with slanted news stories and the partisan commentary of friends, has played a role in reinforcing political polarization. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
They wanted, remembers Michele Moore, to lighten up their tone. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Yesterday, a specially composed panel of judges sitting as the Supreme Court of Alabama unanimously affirmed the judgment of the Alabama Court of the Judiciary suspending Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore for the remainder of his term. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:31 pm
In response, Moore issued an administrative order... [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Kappos, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New YorkProf. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Chief Justice Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm
These arguments brought to mind once again Judge Karen Moore’s concurring opinion in the 6th Circuit, in which she pointed out that “it would seem to be Congress’s job to provide an expanded mechanism for obtaining forfeiture” if in fact such a system does make sense. [read post]
