Search for: "COPE v. COPE"
Results 821 - 840
of 922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
Venezuela has reportedly initiated talks with China over financial support to cope with the sharp drop in oil prices and the arrival of COVID-19, with 91 cases confirmed in the country on 24 March. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Following on the heels of Monday’s announcement that Anthem, Inc. is paying a record setting $16 million to resolve charges its violations of the enterprise risk assessment and other requirements of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule allowed cybercriminals to breach the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of more than 79 million patients, physicians and other health care providers, health plans and health insurers, health care… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
None of this will matter much in the short run; we will learn to cope and adapt to the new system. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
I. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
joint v. sole? [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
In T-Mobile v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
A new disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Rather than using his position of power to help people cope with the raging COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
So, whether by way of just demands for their abolition, or commercially engendered shrinkage of lawyer numbers, law societies are fated to be greatly reduced in purpose, power, and prestige, by reason of management by part-time amateurs (i.e., 19th century benchers unable to cope with the “access to justice” problems (“A2J problems”) of a 21st century law society). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
For example the Federation of Law Societies’ (FLSC’s) text, Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada of 2012,[v] defines the problem in its opening paragraph as being merely, “gaps in access to legal services. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
