Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 8:49 am
The court reasoned that California law has a strong presumption for the ABC test to apply retroactively. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7187, which addresses whether law-enforcement officers may constitutionally insert a key they have seized into a locked apartment door to see whether it fits. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:54 am
Observers say, however, that while the department’s letter will guide employers in avoiding potential liability under the 1938 federal Fair Labor Standards Act, employers must still contend with laws in states such as California, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Jersey that are more restrictive. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:00 am
Adriana Figueroa is an Associate with Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP and contributes to the Indiana Employment Law Letter. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:00 am
Adriana Figueroa is an Associate with Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP and contributes to the Indiana Employment Law Letter. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:44 am
State law, of course, may vary. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:38 am
University of California, Los Angeles Director, Tribal Legal Development Clinic. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:14 am
California Employers While this opinion letter may be helpful for ‘gig’ economy companies that are subject to the FLSA, California employers must still follow the more stringent ABC test established by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 11:56 am
On May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit found that Dynamex applies retroactively under California law in Vazquez v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:42 pm
The ABC test differs markedly from the approach previously used in California—an approach mirrored in the DOL opinion letter and used in a number of other states. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:32 am
Department of Labor issued an employer-friendly opinion letter stating that some gig-economy workers can be properly classified as independent contractors under federal law. [read post]
3 May 2019, 2:25 pm
In 2017, California passed multiple statutes that prohibit employers from considering expunged criminal records in hiring decisions. [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:57 am
Accordingly, agencies in some jurisdictions, including in states that apply the “ABC test” to determine independent contractor status in certain contexts, such as California and New Jersey, may disregard the opinion letter. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
This conclusion rests squarely on statutory law. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
In a June 4 letter to employees, Metalcraft among other things, told these employees: … [A]fter June 4, the law prohibits requiring employees to pay Union dues. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:33 am
California’s complex employment laws prompted 22,000 calls to the CalChamber Labor Law Helpline in 2018. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
California law also protects employees who update their personal information, such as their name or SSN. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(relisted after the March 29, April 12 and April 18 conferences) City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
