Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 12,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 1:33 pm
In Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 9:00 am
Daly v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:28 pm
I will keep watching to see if this case is appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and will keep you posted! [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:45 am
The complaint (full text) in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:29 pm
United States Dept. of Transportation (N.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:46 pm
” United Farm Workers of Am., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:00 pm
” United Farm Workers of Am., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:20 pm
Houston, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, held that borrowers are not intended third-party beneficiaries of the Servicer Participation Agreement and, therefore, lack standing to sue for an alleged breach of the agreement.Benito v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm
The state’s most prominent victims’ organization, Crime Victims United of California, was quick to condemn the decision and predict the worst for public safety. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
State of California (Gaming Compact; Good Faith Negotiations; Land Into Trust)Sorace v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:46 am
The United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California recently held that there was no bad faith where the insurer had a reasonable basis upon which to genuinely dispute the insured’s claim. [read post]
