Search for: "Case Construction Equipment, Inc." Results 821 - 840 of 1,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2010, 5:10 pm
Bobrick Washroom Equip., Inc., 527 F.3d 1379, 1383 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For the purpose of this section, self-propelled caterpillar or crawler-type equipment while being operated on the contract site, shall not be defined as motor vehicles.In May of this year, Rep. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Speaking after the hearing, HSE Inspector Sue Adsett, noted, "This is a tragic case where both the failings of the construction firm and the architects led to (the workers) death. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by Meg Martin
The Court addressed in further detail factors one and two.Governmental immunity – scope of duties: As in Sponsel, the Court applied the same statutory construction rule in the instant case. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
In those cases, the companies had not complied with federal stormwater permits and did not use measures to reduce the environmental impact of stormwater runoff from their construction sites. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
Employers must provide “reasonable accommodation,” such as job restructuring and modification of equipment when necessary. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:59 am by John Buford
The insolvency of prominent contractor Bostic Construction, Inc. has been a fertile source of Business Court litigation over the last couple of years in three cases against the company's officers and directors. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
According to KCI, S & N, through their own NPWT apparatus, infringed two members of the university's patent family: 'Wound drainage equipment' (referred to as 504) and 'Wound drainage canister' (950). 950 was a divisional of 504, both sharing the same priority date. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
Duncan, 919 F.2d 981, 986 (5th Cir. 1990) (hospital records compiled by insurance companies are business records of those companies), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 926 (1991); In re King Enterprises, Inc., 678 F.2d 73, 77 (8th Cir. 1982) (invoices received from suppliers become business records of receiving entity); Matter of Ollag Construction Equipment Corp., 665 F.2d 43, 46 (2nd Cir. 1981) (financial statements supplied to bank are business records of bank); United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The result has been the widespread adoption of fees, with the creative juices of consultants testing the limits of what can be funded through fees (e.g. bullet proof vests for public safety staff.)The latest case in impact fees, Homebuilders Association of Tulare/Kings Counties, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
Justice Paul Pfeifer, writing for the majority in Kauffman Racing Equip. v. [read post]