Search for: "Casey v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 6:53 pm by david
Casey was due to be decided and there was a distinct prospect that the court would use that case to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at a recent decision by the Eighth Circuit holding that a North Dakota law which prohibited abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected is unconstitutional, noting that it “closed with a five-page lament: North Dakota’s law may be inconsistent with Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood, but the Supreme Court should ‘re-evaluate its jurisprudence. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:03 pm
Casey, he voted to uphold the court's ruling in Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2022, 3:41 am by SHG
In Casey, the Supreme Court held that states may not impose an “undue burden” on abortion and include “exceptions for pregnancies which endanger the woman’s life or health. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s ruling and directed Garden City “to defend and indemnify” Cotter in the civil action brought by McCarthy.In the words of the Appellate Division, “The Legislature created Education Law §3811 to protect teachers from a broader array of claims than those encompassed by Education Law §3023, citing Casey v Tieman, 110 AD2d 167. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Keynote Speech: Resources of Conflict – Conflicts over ResourcesCindy Daase, The Redistribution of Resources in Internationalized Intra-State Peace Processes by Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Security Council ResolutionsAlice Ruzza, The Falkland Islands and the UK v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]