Search for: "Charles" Results 821 - 840 of 31,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 2:13 pm by Christine Corcos
Now available: Peter Charles Hoffer, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024). [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:13 pm
Now available: Peter Charles Hoffer, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Close to 9,500 of these works have been copied and made accessible for curious readers to peruse in the digital anthology, “The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
But the administrative process Hill complained of has worked to his advantage now that an SEC administrative law judge has dismissed the in-house case the Enforcement Division brought against Hill under Exchange Act Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-3 (In the Matter of Charles L. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 2:07 pm
THE CHARLES RANGEL SCANDALS CONTINUE: Rangel in September said he would hire a "forensic accountant" (think: "CSI: Charlie") to untangle a 20-year morass of tax returns and to determine just how much money he's made and how much in unpaid taxes he may still owe. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:47 pm
Yesterday afternoon the Court of Criminal Appeals denied a stay request for Charles Hood. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:51 am
"Ardor in the Court, Part 3," is the latest installation of Alan Berlow's reportage on the contorted Charles Dean Hood case. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 1:55 pm by Staff Attorney
According to BrokerCheck records former financial advisor Charles Bloom (Bloom), formerly employed by Chelsea Financial Services (Chelsea Financial) has been subject to at least two customer complaints. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:43 pm
Charles teen is dead and three others were seriously injured in what police are calling a "hill hopping" accident or auto accident. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by John O'Sullivan
A year ago I posted here on the UK Court of Appeal’s ruling which set aside the government’s veto of a decision under freedom of information legislation for the release of “advocacy correspondence” from Prince Charles’s to government ministers. [read post]