Search for: "Child v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 18,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:58 am
Regina (Shoesmith) v OFSTED and others [2011] EWCA Civ 642; [2011] WLR (D) 184 “The report of Ofsted into child safeguarding arrangements within a local authority, requested by the Secretary of State for Education following the death of a child while on the authority’s child protection register, was properly and fairly carried out under the statutory requirements of section 20 of the Children Act 2004. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 8:45 am
Source: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/V/481 Read More [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:34 am
In the case, Ho-Rath v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:05 pm
The law, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, challenges the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 2:32 pm
This decision was affirmed by the Florida Supreme court in Rupp v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Additional Resources: State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 5:28 am
In Chica v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:44 am
The post Harter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:13 pm
It applies when there is a "final judicial custody determination" as stated in the Montenegro v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
See Fischbach v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
” Purdy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:16 pm
Think jail time.*** I seriously think Wisconsin v. [read post]
