Search for: "Coates v. Coates"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2020, 11:39 am
Kroger Co. and Nguyen v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 11:25 am
Alvis Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court has opted not to display the royal coat of arms in its courtrooms, unlike other courts in this country. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
The line of cases, from Revlon and Paramount v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am
The Ninth Circuit affirmed this decision citing the principles set forth in Satava v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
In Level 4 Yoga, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
In Level 4 Yoga, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm
American Coatings Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo | The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) | Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities | GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and… [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:18 pm
21; Kuszak [v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:15 am
Management Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am
In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:00 am
Kelly v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:36 am
From Evans v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
” Rhodes v. [read post]
