Search for: "Cole v State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
The en banc decision of the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm by The Editors
Court of Appeals Second Circuit’s rehearing of Arar v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Raymond Saleilles, École historique et droit naturelCriticizing the German historical school’s spirit “of immobilization, attachment to the past and almost mystical return to the old customary curiosities of law,” Saleilles suggested increasing objectivity by using legislative analogy, collective legal conscience, and, above all, comparative law. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Paul Cole, Bournemouth University; European Patent Attorney, Lucas & Co, UK. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:49 pm by Will Aitchison
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole’s opinion in Dominguez v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:29 am by Jim Walker
Carnival was represented by Tom Scott and Armando Rubio of the Cole, Scott & Kissane law firm. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  It was reported that Heather Mills was contemplating action – along with, inter alia, Ashley Cole and Wayne Rooney. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Two other law professors, Sarah Cole of the Ohio State Univeristy Moritz College of Law, and Jean Sternlight of the University of Nevada at Las Vegas School of Law, have posts on the decision at ADR Profs Blog. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
, Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP, Denver 13 $132,500,000 Products Liability Cole v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by CJLF Staff
  CNN has this story.Lawyers Urge Supreme Court to Extend Graham v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]