Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff and his wife cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
The following articles in the zero draft, released in June, are the focus of our main concerns about Chapter V,  which deals with cross border surveillance and the extent to which Member States must assist each other and collaborate in surveillance on each other's behalf. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am by Eugene Volokh
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Letters before action were then sent and undertakings by the first and second defendants were then given stating they would comply with the shareholders' agreement for 60 days. [read post]