Search for: "DAY v. USA" Results 821 - 840 of 2,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 8:49 am by Michael Ginsborg
Because the timing of the vote is around the holidays, it also seems that the next day for public comments to be heard, will be only 2 days before the court’s deadline and 6 days before the trial begins. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
In op-ed for The Hill, Kristin Waggoner weighs in on American Legion v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
Tony Mauro at the BLT provides an overview of the day at the Court here. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
Wednesday was another busy day at the Court, which heard oral argument in two cases and issued two opinions. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 The same day, the Supreme Court rejected that test as the sole test for determining patentability in Bilski v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:15 am
His cell phone records do not routinely show him in that area on other days of the week, implying that he was worshipping at those times. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:34 pm
The conference revisited the decision in Bridgeman Art Library v Corel Corporation (New York Southern District Court 1999).In the case under discussion, the Corel Corporation, a Canadian software company, was distributing clip art CDs in the USA. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
MsLods’ Round-Up, Law + Technology, 6 February 2015 Next week in the courts The trial in Razzaq v Blackheath Jamia Mosque Trust & Others will begin on 9 February 2015 in Birmingham and is listed for 5 days. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:01 am by Michael Wukoschitz
Finally, the appeals court upheld the trial court’s refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims, holding that the plaintiff had failed to prove the “exceptional circumstances” necessary for the exercise of such jurisdiction.Case Kalick v. [read post]